1 /* 2 * Copyright (c) 2015, 2022, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 3 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. 4 * 5 * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it 6 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as 7 * published by the Free Software Foundation. 8 * 9 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT 10 * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or 11 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License 12 * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that 13 * accompanied this code). 14 * 15 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version 16 * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, 17 * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. 18 * 19 * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA 20 * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any 21 * questions. 22 */ 23 24 /* 25 * @test ReservedStackTest 26 * 27 * @requires vm.opt.DeoptimizeALot != true 28 * @library /test/lib 29 * @modules java.base/jdk.internal.misc 30 * @modules java.base/jdk.internal.vm.annotation 31 * 32 * @run main/othervm -XX:+IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions -XX:CompileCommand=DontInline,java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock.lock -XX:CompileCommand=exclude,java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractOwnableSynchronizer.setExclusiveOwnerThread ReservedStackTest 33 */ 34 35 /* The exclusion of java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractOwnableSynchronizer.setExclusiveOwnerThread() 36 * from the compilable methods is required to ensure that the test will be able 37 * to trigger a StackOverflowError on the right method. 38 * 39 * The DontInline directive for ReentrantLock.lock() ensures that lockAndcall 40 * is not considered as being annotated by ReservedStackAccess by virtue of 41 * it inlining such a method. 42 */ 43 44 45 /* 46 * Notes about this test: 47 * This test tries to reproduce a rare but nasty corruption bug that 48 * occurs when a StackOverflowError is thrown in some critical sections 49 * of the ReentrantLock implementation. 50 * 51 * Here's the critical section where a corruption could occur 52 * (from java.util.concurrent.ReentrantLock.java) 53 * 54 * final void lock() { 55 * if (compareAndSetState(0, 1)) 56 * setExclusiveOwnerThread(Thread.currentThread()); 57 * else 58 * acquire(1); 59 * } 60 * 61 * The corruption occurs when the compareAndSetState(0, 1) 62 * successfully updates the status of the lock but the method 63 * fails to set the owner because of a stack overflow. 64 * HotSpot checks for stack overflow on method invocations. 65 * The test must trigger a stack overflow either when 66 * Thread.currentThread() or setExclusiveOwnerThread() is 67 * invoked. 68 * 69 * The test starts with a recursive invocation loop until a 70 * first StackOverflowError is thrown, the Error is caught 71 * and a few dozen frames are exited. Now the thread has 72 * little free space on its execution stack and will try 73 * to trigger a stack overflow in the critical section. 74 * The test has a huge array of ReentrantLocks instances. 75 * The thread invokes a recursive method which, at each 76 * of its invocations, tries to acquire the next lock 77 * in the array. The execution continues until a 78 * StackOverflowError is thrown or the end of the array 79 * is reached. 80 * If no StackOverflowError has been thrown, the test 81 * is non conclusive (recommendation: increase the size 82 * of the ReentrantLock array). 83 * The status of all Reentrant locks in the array is checked, 84 * if a corruption is detected, the test failed, otherwise 85 * the test passed. 86 * 87 * To have a chance that the stack overflow occurs on one 88 * of the two targeted method invocations, the test is 89 * repeated in different threads. Each Java thread has a 90 * random size area allocated at the beginning of its 91 * stack to prevent false sharing. The test relies on this 92 * to have different stack alignments when it hits the targeted 93 * methods (the test could have been written with a native 94 * method with alloca, but using different Java threads makes 95 * the test 100% Java). 96 * 97 * One additional trick is required to ensure that the stack 98 * overflow will occur on the Thread.currentThread() getter 99 * or the setExclusiveOwnerThread() setter. 100 * 101 * Potential stack overflows are detected by stack banging, 102 * at method invocation time. 103 * In interpreted code, the stack banging performed for the 104 * lock() method goes further than the stack banging performed 105 * for the getter or the setter method, so the potential stack 106 * overflow is detected before entering the critical section. 107 * In compiled code, the getter and the setter are in-lined, 108 * so the stack banging is only performed before entering the 109 * critical section. 110 * In order to have a stack banging that goes further for the 111 * getter/setter methods than for the lock() method, the test 112 * exploits the property that interpreter frames are (much) 113 * bigger than compiled code frames. When the test is run, 114 * a compiler option disables the compilation of the 115 * setExclusiveOwnerThread() method. 116 * 117 */ 118 119 import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock; 120 import jdk.test.lib.Platform; 121 import jdk.test.lib.process.ProcessTools; 122 import jdk.test.lib.process.OutputAnalyzer; 123 124 public class ReservedStackTest { 125 126 static class ReentrantLockTest { 127 128 private ReentrantLock lockArray[]; 129 // Frame sizes vary a lot between interpreted code and compiled code 130 // so the lock array has to be big enough to cover all cases. 131 // If test fails with message "Not conclusive test", try to increase 132 // LOCK_ARRAY_SIZE value 133 private static final int LOCK_ARRAY_SIZE = 8192; 134 private boolean stackOverflowErrorReceived; 135 StackOverflowError soe = null; 136 private int index = -1; 137 138 public void initialize() { 139 lockArray = new ReentrantLock[LOCK_ARRAY_SIZE]; 140 for (int i = 0; i < LOCK_ARRAY_SIZE; i++) { 141 lockArray[i] = new ReentrantLock(); 142 } 143 stackOverflowErrorReceived = false; 144 } 145 146 public String getResult() { 147 if (!stackOverflowErrorReceived) { 148 return "ERROR: Not conclusive test: no StackOverflowError received"; 149 } 150 for (int i = 0; i < LOCK_ARRAY_SIZE; i++) { 151 if (lockArray[i].isLocked()) { 152 if (!lockArray[i].isHeldByCurrentThread()) { 153 StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder(); 154 s.append("FAILED: ReentrantLock "); 155 s.append(i); 156 s.append(" looks corrupted"); 157 return s.toString(); 158 } 159 } 160 } 161 return "PASSED"; 162 } 163 164 public void run() { 165 try { 166 lockAndCall(0); 167 } catch (StackOverflowError e) { 168 soe = e; 169 stackOverflowErrorReceived = true; 170 throw e; 171 } 172 } 173 174 private void lockAndCall(int i) { 175 index = i; 176 if (i < LOCK_ARRAY_SIZE) { 177 lockArray[i].lock(); 178 lockAndCall(i + 1); 179 } 180 } 181 } 182 183 static class RunWithSOEContext implements Runnable { 184 185 int counter; 186 int deframe; 187 int decounter; 188 int setupSOEFrame; 189 int testStartFrame; 190 ReentrantLockTest test; 191 192 public RunWithSOEContext(ReentrantLockTest test, int deframe) { 193 this.test = test; 194 this.deframe = deframe; 195 } 196 197 @Override 198 @jdk.internal.vm.annotation.ReservedStackAccess 199 public void run() { 200 counter = 0; 201 decounter = deframe; 202 test.initialize(); 203 recursiveCall(); 204 String result = test.getResult(); 205 // The feature is not fully implemented on all platforms, 206 // corruptions are still possible. 207 if (isSupportedPlatform && !result.contains("PASSED")) { 208 throw new Error(result); 209 } else { 210 // Either the test passed or this platform is not supported. 211 // On not supported platforms, we only expect the VM to 212 // not crash during the test. This is especially important 213 // on Windows where the detection of SOE in annotated 214 // sections is implemented but the reserved zone mechanism 215 // to avoid the corruption cannot be implemented yet 216 // because of JDK-8067946 217 System.out.println("PASSED"); 218 } 219 } 220 221 void recursiveCall() { 222 // Unused local variables to increase the frame size 223 long l1, l2, l3, l4, l5, l6, l7, l8, l9, l10, l11, l12, l13, l14, l15, l16, l17, l18, l19; 224 long l20, l21, l22, l23, l24, l25, l26, l27, l28, l30, l31, l32, l33, l34, l35, l36, l37; 225 counter++; 226 try { 227 recursiveCall(); 228 } catch (StackOverflowError e) { 229 } 230 decounter--; 231 if (decounter == 0) { 232 setupSOEFrame = counter; 233 testStartFrame = counter - deframe; 234 test.run(); 235 } 236 } 237 } 238 239 private static boolean isAlwaysSupportedPlatform() { 240 return Platform.isAix() || 241 (Platform.isLinux() && 242 (Platform.isPPC() || Platform.isS390x() || Platform.isX64() || 243 Platform.isX86() || Platform.isAArch64() || Platform.isRISCV64())) || 244 Platform.isOSX(); 245 } 246 247 private static boolean isNeverSupportedPlatform() { 248 return !isAlwaysSupportedPlatform(); 249 } 250 251 private static boolean isSupportedPlatform; 252 253 private static void initIsSupportedPlatform() throws Exception { 254 // In order to dynamicaly determine if the platform supports the reserved 255 // stack area, run with -XX:StackReservedPages=1 and see if we get the 256 // expected warning message for platforms that don't support it. 257 ProcessBuilder pb = ProcessTools.createJavaProcessBuilder("-XX:StackReservedPages=1", "-version"); 258 OutputAnalyzer output = new OutputAnalyzer(pb.start()); 259 System.out.println("StackReservedPages=1 log: [" + output.getOutput() + "]"); 260 if (output.getExitValue() != 0) { 261 String msg = "Could not launch with -XX:StackReservedPages=1: exit " + output.getExitValue(); 262 System.err.println("FAILED: " + msg); 263 throw new RuntimeException(msg); 264 } 265 266 isSupportedPlatform = true; 267 String matchStr = "Reserved Stack Area not supported on this platform"; 268 int match_idx = output.getOutput().indexOf(matchStr); 269 if (match_idx >= 0) { 270 isSupportedPlatform = false; 271 } 272 273 // Do a sanity check. Some platforms we know are always supported. Make sure 274 // we didn't determine that one of those platforms is not supported. 275 if (!isSupportedPlatform && isAlwaysSupportedPlatform()) { 276 String msg = "This platform should be supported: " + Platform.getOsArch(); 277 System.err.println("FAILED: " + msg); 278 throw new RuntimeException(msg); 279 } 280 281 // And some platforms we know are never supported. Make sure 282 // we didn't determine that one of those platforms is supported. 283 if (isSupportedPlatform && isNeverSupportedPlatform()) { 284 String msg = "This platform should not be supported: " + Platform.getOsArch(); 285 System.err.println("FAILED: " + msg); 286 throw new RuntimeException(msg); 287 } 288 } 289 290 public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { 291 initIsSupportedPlatform(); 292 for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) { 293 // Each iteration has to be executed by a new thread. The test 294 // relies on the random size area pushed by the VM at the beginning 295 // of the stack of each Java thread it creates. 296 Thread thread = new Thread(new RunWithSOEContext(new ReentrantLockTest(), 256)); 297 thread.start(); 298 try { 299 thread.join(); 300 } catch (InterruptedException ex) { } 301 } 302 } 303 } --- EOF ---